Code Quality & Technical Debt Posture

Axiom Platforms Engineering Org · 120 developers · 8 production repositories

Last updated: Sprint 12, Week 36 · Data range: 90 days

North-Star Metric
$2,340
Engineering cost per feature point
+18% vs Q2
Org-Wide TDR
6.8%
+1.2%
Critical CVEs
18
+6
Avg age: 42 days
Flaky Test Rate
4.2%
-0.8%
3 services degraded
Code Duplication
7.1%
+0.4%
Target: <5%
CI Success Rate
92.3%
+2.1%
Last 7 days
Review Resolution
18.4h
+3.2h
Mean comment time

Technical Debt Ratio Trend by Repository

CVE Age Bucket Heatmap

0-14d
15-30d
31-60d
60d+
Critical
3
5
7
3
High
8
12
9
4
Medium
15
18
11
6

18 critical vulnerabilities; 6 added in Sprint 7 (payments-service Dependabot alerts)

Flaky Test Rate by Service

Architectural Coupling by Module (Afferent + Efferent)

CI Build Success Rate by Stage

Dependency Freshness & Security Hotspots

Dependency Freshness Index 68%

32% dependencies >3 versions behind latest

Security Hotspot Remediation Rate 74%

26% open hotspots unaddressed in Sprint 12

payments-service Alert
6 critical Dependabot alerts unpatched since Sprint 7 feature freeze

Repository Debt Scorecard

Repository TDR % Δ Sprint Critical Issues Code Dup % Coupling Score CI Success % Risk Level
payments-service 10.4% +2.1% 12 9.2% 84 88.3% Critical
auth-gateway 8.7% +1.4% 8 6.8% 72 91.2% High
ledger-core 7.3% +0.9% 6 8.1% 68 93.7% High
customer-api 5.9% -0.3% 4 5.4% 58 94.8% Medium
notification-worker 4.8% -0.5% 3 4.9% 42 96.1% Medium
analytics-engine 6.2% +0.7% 5 7.3% 64 92.5% Medium
reporting-service 3.6% -0.2% 2 3.8% 36 97.4% Low
admin-portal 5.1% +0.4% 3 6.2% 48 95.2% Medium

Mean Code Review Comment Resolution Time (hours)

Resolution time increased 3.2 hours in Sprint 10–12 as team tackled payments-service technical debt backlog