Revenue Intelligence & Cohort Performance

Structural drivers of sustainable revenue: cohort LTV trajectories, margin contribution by category, and funnel efficiency across acquisition channels.

REPORTING PERIOD
Q1 2025
Jan 1 - Mar 31
LTV:CAC Ratio
3.8x
+0.4 vs Q4
90D Retention Revenue
$487K
+12% cohort avg
Blended Gross Margin
42.3%
-1.2pp vs Q4
Checkout Conversion
68.4%
+3.1pp vs Q4
Avg Order Value
$128
+$9 vs Q4
Repeat Purchase Rate
34.2%
+2.8pp 90-day window

90-Day Cohort LTV Trajectories

Cumulative revenue per customer by acquisition cohort

Category Gross Margin Contribution

Revenue × margin % by product category

Average Order Value by Channel

Basket economics across acquisition sources

Checkout Funnel Stage Conversion

Revenue lost at each checkout step — Q1 2025

Cart View 45,200 sessions
Shipping Info 38,420 sessions (85.0%)
Payment Info 34,680 sessions (76.7%)
Order Placed 30,917 orders (68.4%)
31.6% drop-off → $1.82M potential revenue lost
Largest leak: Shipping → Payment (8.3pp). Prioritize payment UX optimization.

Subscription vs. One-Time Revenue

Q1 2025 revenue predictability

Subscription ARR
$2.14M
One-Time
$3.68M

Cohort Performance Summary

Top acquisition cohorts by 90-day LTV

Cohort Customers 90D LTV LTV:CAC
Jan 2025 1,847 $263 4.2x
Feb 2025 2,103 $271 4.4x
Mar 2025 1,956 $248 3.9x
Dec 2024 2,584 $289 4.6x
Nov 2024 1,692 $234 3.5x
Oct 2024 1,523 $218 3.3x
Sep 2024 1,405 $197 3.1x
Aug 2024 1,298 $182 2.8x

Strategic Insight: Cohort Quality Inflection

Dec 2024–Feb 2025 cohorts demonstrate 4.2–4.6x LTV:CAC, up from 2.8–3.3x in Aug–Oct 2024. This 35% efficiency gain validates recent CAC ceiling increases. However, blended gross margin compression (-1.2pp) driven by increased Electronics mix (34% → 41% of GMV, 38% margin vs. 48% Home & Garden) partially offsets cohort quality gains. Recommendation: maintain current CAC spend but shift promotional budget toward high-margin Home & Garden to stabilize blended margin above 43%, protecting net revenue per cohort.