Operational Metrics Dashboard

Process Throughput & Cycle Time Optimization — Meridian Industrial Components

Last 30 Days — Updated 2 hours ago

P90 Cycle Time

9.2h

-29.8% vs Q start

P50 Cycle Time

5.4h

-24.1%

Throughput Rate

47.2

units/hour

+8.3%

First-Pass Yield

91.4%

-1.2%

WIP Age (Avg)

2.8d

-18.4%

Rework Rate

8.6%

-2.1pp

Cycle Time Trend — P50 / P90 / P99

Stage-Level Queue Depth

Constraint Stage Efficiency

QA Check 67%

CNC Milling 82%

Assembly 89%

Final Inspection 91%

Packaging 94%

Throughput Rate by Shift (units/hour)

WIP Age Distribution

Handoff Latency by Stage

Raw → CNC 8.2 min

CNC → QA 34.1 min

QA → Assembly 12.7 min

Assembly → Inspection 9.4 min

Inspection → Packaging 6.8 min

Resource Utilization

Rework Cost Impact

Total Rework Labor

$18,420

This month

Units Reworked

847

SOP Compliance

94.2%

Adherence Score

Above target (90%)

Process Stage Performance Detail

Stage	Avg Cycle (h)	Queue Depth	Throughput	FPY %	Util %	Rework %
Raw Material Prep	0.6	12	52.1	98.2	87	1.8
CNC Milling	1.8	34	48.3	93.7	82	6.3
QA Check	3.1	78	41.2	87.4	67	12.6
Rework Station	2.2	18	9.4	95.1	73	4.9
Assembly	1.4	22	46.8	94.3	89	5.7
Final Inspection	0.9	16	47.6	96.8	91	3.2
Packaging	0.4	8	49.2	99.1	94	0.9
Shipping Prep	0.3	5	50.1	99.4	88	0.6

Work Order Completion Distribution

Key Insights & Actions

QA Check is primary constraint

Queue depth 2.3× higher than other stages; 67% efficiency vs 88% target

P90 cycle time reduced 29.8%

Improvement stalled at week 4; need QA staffing or process redesign to continue gains

Handoff latency CNC→QA at 34.1 min

4× longer than other handoffs; implement push notification or WIP slots