Sustainability & ESG Impact Operations

Harden Industrial Group · ESG-Linked Cost Avoidance & Revenue Protection

As of Dec 31, 2024

SBTi 1.5°C Pathway RE100 Committed

Scope 1+2 Emissions Intensity

42.8

tCO2e / $1M Revenue

↓ 8.2% YoY

Renewable Energy Rate

68%

of Total Electricity

↑ 12% YoY

Supplier Tier-1 Concentration

61%

Top 10 Suppliers

↑ 3% YoY

Water Intensity

3.2

m³ / Unit Production

↓ 5.1% YoY

Waste Diversion Rate

82%

from Landfill

↑ 6% YoY

ESG Contract Revenue at Risk

$87M

Performance Clauses

↑ $12M QoQ

Facility ESG Performance by Region

Facility	ESG Score	Status
Louisville, KY	88	On Target
Monterrey, MX	91	On Target
Hamburg, DE	85	On Target
Stuttgart, DE	72	Watch
Shanghai, CN	78	Watch
Mumbai, IN	81	On Target

Emissions Intensity vs Revenue

Carbon Credit Purchase Obligation

Current Trajectory$2.4M

With Planned Initiatives$1.1M

Target (SBTi Aligned)$0.6M

Gap to Target: $1.8M

Stuttgart site accounts for 42% of shortfall

Renewable Energy Procurement by Site

Water Intensity Trend

Waste Diversion by Category

Safety Incident Rate (TRIR)

ESG Facility Data — Q4 2024

Facility	Scope 1+2 (tCO2e)	RE %	Water (m³)	Waste Div. %	TRIR	ESG Score
Louisville, KY	8,420	72%	12,400	85%	0.82	88
Monterrey, MX	6,210	81%	9,100	89%	0.71	91
Hamburg, DE	4,850	88%	7,200	91%	0.65	85
Stuttgart, DE	11,230	54%	18,700	68%	1.24	72
Shanghai, CN	9,840	62%	14,300	74%	0.96	78
Mumbai, IN	7,120	68%	11,900	79%	0.88	81
São Paulo, BR	5,680	76%	8,600	83%	0.79	84
Sydney, AU	3,940	85%	6,100	87%	0.58	89

Supplier Emissions Concentration

DEI Composite Index

Leadership Diversity72

Pay Equity Ratio94

Representation Gap68

Inclusion Survey Score81

Composite: 79

Target: 85 by EOY 2025

Scenario Planning: 2025 ESG Impact

Projected Emissions Intensity

39.2

tCO2e / $1M Revenue

Carbon Credit Obligation

$1.1M

Annual Cost

ESG Contract Retention

96%

of At-Risk Revenue