Team Output Performance

Helix Systems · Platform Squad · Sprint S47

High Burnout Risk Detected

K. Osei (Burnout Index: 78) — Weekend commits + 18% rework rate. M. Tran (Burnout Index: 72) — 11 consecutive high-utilization days. Immediate intervention recommended.

Sprint Predictability Below Target

83% delivery rate (target: 90%). Scope changes affected 3 of 8 committed epics. Review sprint planning buffer allocation.

Avg Task Velocity

38.2

+5.3% vs S46

Avg Cycle Time

6.8h

+8.2% per point

Focus Time Ratio

52%

-3.1% of work hrs

Rework Rate

11.2%

+2.4% tickets

Delivery Predict.

83%

-7% target: 90%

Avg Burnout Risk

+12 2 critical

Individual Output Performance

Team Member	Story Pts	Cycle Time	Focus %	Rework %	Collab Score	Burnout Risk	Status
A. Patel Staff Engineer	52	5.1h	63%	6%	8.4	31	Healthy
J. Kim Senior Engineer	41	6.8h	57%	8%	7.1	44	Monitor
K. Osei IC Engineer	29	8.9h	41%	18%	4.2	78	CRITICAL
M. Tran Senior Engineer	33	7.4h	46%	14%	5.8	72	CRITICAL
R. Santos Staff Engineer	48	5.6h	61%	7%	9.2	35	Healthy
L. Chen Senior Engineer	37	7.1h	54%	9%	6.7	48	Monitor
D. Kumar IC Engineer	31	8.2h	49%	12%	5.1	58	Monitor
S. Rodriguez Senior Engineer	43	6.3h	59%	8%	7.9	39	Healthy

Sprint Velocity Trend

Cycle Time by Engineer

Focus Time vs Burnout Risk

Key Insights & Actions

Immediate: Reduce load for K. Osei & M. Tran

Both showing critical burnout signals. Redistribute 15-20 story points to A. Patel & R. Santos who have capacity headroom.

This Sprint: Reduce scope churn

17% of committed work saw mid-sprint scope changes. Tighten pre-sprint refinement and establish a formal change control threshold.

Next Sprint: Boost collaborative output

K. Osei & D. Kumar showing low collab scores (4.2, 5.1). Pair them with high-collab engineers (R. Santos 9.2) to improve knowledge transfer.